Skip to main content

Mulgrave vs Oak Park

Property investment comparison - Mulgrave, VIC 3170 vs Oak Park, VIC 3046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mulgrave wins 3, Oak Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMulgraveOak Park
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$850K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.35%
1-year house growth+2.3%-4.3%
3-year house growth+14.7%+4.2%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.5%
Population19,8896,714

Mulgrave vs Oak Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Mulgrave and $1.1M in Oak Park, so Mulgrave is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mulgrave sits at a median of $850K against $665K in Oak Park, which makes Oak Park the more affordable unit market and Mulgrave the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Mulgrave and -4.3% in Oak Park, so recent momentum favours Mulgrave, while Oak Park went backwards.

Looking back three years, Mulgrave houses are +14.7% and Oak Park houses +4.2%, so Mulgrave has compounded faster than Oak Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Oak Park and 1.9% in Mulgrave, so landlords in Oak Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mulgrave is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,889 against 6,714, roughly 3.0 times the size of Oak Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mulgrave for a lower purchase price, Mulgrave for recent price momentum, Oak Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison