Mundoo Island vs Para Vista
Property investment comparison - Mundoo Island, SA 5214 vs Para Vista, SA 5093
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mundoo Island wins 0, Para Vista wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mundoo Island | Para Vista |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $865K | $850K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.32% | 3.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.68% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.3% |
| Population | 0 | 3,023 |
Mundoo Island vs Para Vista: what the numbers say
The median house price is $865K in Mundoo Island and $850K in Para Vista, so Para Vista is the cheaper entry point, with Mundoo Island houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Para Vista leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.79%, compared with 3.32% in Mundoo Island, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Para Vista and 0.8% in Mundoo Island, so landlords in Para Vista face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Para Vista for rental income, Para Vista for a lower purchase price, Para Vista for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison