Skip to main content

Munno Para Downs vs Point Turton

Property investment comparison - Munno Para Downs, SA 5115 vs Point Turton, SA 5575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Munno Para Downs wins 2, Point Turton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMunno Para DownsPoint Turton
Median house price$705K$700K
Median unit price$390K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)6.03%4.61%
1-year house growth+11.8%estimate+12.9%
3-year house growth-+57.2%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.5%
Population181350

Munno Para Downs vs Point Turton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $705K in Munno Para Downs and $700K in Point Turton, so Point Turton is the cheaper entry point, with Munno Para Downs houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Munno Para Downs (an estimate) and +12.9% in Point Turton, so recent momentum favours Point Turton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Munno Para Downs and 1.5% in Point Turton, so landlords in Munno Para Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Point Turton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 350 against 181, larger than Munno Para Downs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Point Turton for a lower purchase price, Point Turton for recent price momentum, Munno Para Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison