Skip to main content

Murchison vs Terrick Terrick

Property investment comparison - Murchison, VIC 3610 vs Terrick Terrick, VIC 3575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murchison wins 1, Terrick Terrick wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurchisonTerrick Terrick
Median house price$425K$420K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)5.29%2.64%
Gross rental yield (units)7.79%-
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.7%1.2%
Population8848

Murchison vs Terrick Terrick: what the numbers say

The median house price is $425K in Murchison and $420K in Terrick Terrick, so Terrick Terrick is the cheaper entry point, with Murchison houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Murchison leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.29%, compared with 2.64% in Terrick Terrick, a gap of 2.65 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Terrick Terrick and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Terrick Terrick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 8, roughly 111 times the size of Terrick Terrick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Murchison for rental income, Terrick Terrick for a lower purchase price, Terrick Terrick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison