Murchison vs Yarrawalla
Property investment comparison - Murchison, VIC 3610 vs Yarrawalla, VIC 3575
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murchison wins 1, Yarrawalla wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Murchison | Yarrawalla |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $425K | $415K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.29% | 2.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.79% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.7% | 0.9% |
| Population | 884 | 78 |
Murchison vs Yarrawalla: what the numbers say
The median house price is $425K in Murchison and $415K in Yarrawalla, so Yarrawalla is the cheaper entry point, with Murchison houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Murchison leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.29%, compared with 2.35% in Yarrawalla, a gap of 2.94 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Yarrawalla and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Yarrawalla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 78, roughly 11 times the size of Yarrawalla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Murchison for rental income, Yarrawalla for a lower purchase price, Yarrawalla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison