Murra Warra vs Rushworth
Property investment comparison - Murra Warra, VIC 3401 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murra Warra wins 0, Rushworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Murra Warra | Rushworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $385K | $370K |
| Median unit price | - | $310K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.23% | 5.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.09% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -8.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.8% |
| Population | 63 | 1,411 |
Murra Warra vs Rushworth: what the numbers say
The median house price is $385K in Murra Warra and $370K in Rushworth, so Rushworth is the cheaper entry point, with Murra Warra houses about 4% dearer.
On cash flow, Rushworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.33%, compared with 5.23% in Murra Warra, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.
Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 63, roughly 22 times the size of Murra Warra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rushworth for rental income, Rushworth for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison