Skip to main content

Murrindindi vs Taylors Lakes

Property investment comparison - Murrindindi, VIC 3717 vs Taylors Lakes, VIC 3038

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrindindi wins 0, Taylors Lakes wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurrindindiTaylors Lakes
Median house price$1M$990K
Median unit price$820K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.60%3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.49%
1-year house growth-+8.3%
3-year house growth-+7.4%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.5%
Population11415,174

Murrindindi vs Taylors Lakes: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1M in Murrindindi and $990K in Taylors Lakes, so Taylors Lakes is the cheaper entry point, with Murrindindi houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Murrindindi sits at a median of $820K against $625K in Taylors Lakes, which makes Taylors Lakes the more affordable unit market and Murrindindi the pricier one.

On cash flow, Taylors Lakes leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.15%, compared with 2.60% in Murrindindi, a gap of 0.55 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Taylors Lakes and 2.2% in Murrindindi, so landlords in Taylors Lakes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taylors Lakes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,174 against 114, roughly 133 times the size of Murrindindi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Taylors Lakes for rental income, Taylors Lakes for a lower purchase price, Taylors Lakes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison