Murrindindi vs Wandong
Property investment comparison - Murrindindi, VIC 3717 vs Wandong, VIC 3758
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrindindi wins 1, Wandong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Murrindindi | Wandong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | $820K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.60% | 2.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.50% | 4.92% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -10.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Population | 114 | 1,477 |
Murrindindi vs Wandong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Murrindindi and $1M in Wandong.
On cash flow, Wandong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 2.60% in Murrindindi, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Murrindindi and 4.1% in Wandong, so landlords in Murrindindi face less competition for tenants.
Wandong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,477 against 114, roughly 13 times the size of Murrindindi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wandong for rental income, Murrindindi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison