Skip to main content

Murringo vs Pages River

Property investment comparison - Murringo, NSW 2586 vs Pages River, NSW 2337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murringo wins 0, Pages River wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurringoPages River
Median house price$590K$585K
Median unit price$420K$320K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.97%5.72%
Gross rental yield (units)3.87%7.38%
1-year house growth-13.3%-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.2%0.8%
Population3905

Murringo vs Pages River: what the numbers say

The median house price is $590K in Murringo and $585K in Pages River, so Pages River is the cheaper entry point, with Murringo houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Murringo sits at a median of $420K against $320K in Pages River, which makes Pages River the more affordable unit market and Murringo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pages River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.72%, compared with 3.97% in Murringo, a gap of 1.75 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Pages River and 6.2% in Murringo, so landlords in Pages River face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Murringo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 390 against 5, roughly 78 times the size of Pages River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pages River for rental income, Pages River for a lower purchase price, Pages River for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison