Skip to main content

Murrumba Downs vs Oxley

Property investment comparison - Murrumba Downs, QLD 4503 vs Oxley, QLD 4075

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrumba Downs wins 2, Oxley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurrumba DownsOxley
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$770K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%4.07%
1-year house growth+12.6%+20.3%
3-year house growth+53.7%+48.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.7%
Population10,7959,100

Murrumba Downs vs Oxley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Murrumba Downs and $1.1M in Oxley.

For units, Murrumba Downs sits at a median of $770K against $825K in Oxley, which makes Murrumba Downs the more affordable unit market and Oxley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in Murrumba Downs and +20.3% in Oxley, so recent momentum favours Oxley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Murrumba Downs houses are +53.7% and Oxley houses +48.1%, so Murrumba Downs has compounded faster than Oxley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Oxley and 1.3% in Murrumba Downs, so landlords in Oxley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Murrumba Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,795 against 9,100, larger than Oxley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxley for recent price momentum, Oxley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison