Skip to main content

Murrumbeena vs Parkdale

Property investment comparison - Murrumbeena, VIC 3163 vs Parkdale, VIC 3195

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrumbeena wins 0, Parkdale wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurrumbeenaParkdale
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price-$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.52%2.66%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.15%
1-year house growth+0.0%+8.1%
3-year house growth+0.0%+19.7%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.4%
Population9,99612,308

Murrumbeena vs Parkdale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Murrumbeena and $1.6M in Parkdale, so Parkdale is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Parkdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.66%, compared with 2.52% in Murrumbeena, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.0% in Murrumbeena and +8.1% in Parkdale, so recent momentum favours Parkdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Murrumbeena houses are +0.0% and Parkdale houses +19.7%, so Parkdale has compounded faster than Murrumbeena over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.

Parkdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,308 against 9,996, larger than Murrumbeena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Parkdale for rental income, Parkdale for a lower purchase price, Parkdale for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison