Skip to main content

Myrrhee vs Somerville

Property investment comparison - Myrrhee, VIC 3732 vs Somerville, VIC 3912

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Myrrhee wins 1, Somerville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMyrrheeSomerville
Median house price$920K$915K
Median unit price$170K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.91%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.63%
1-year house growth-+6.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.0%0.3%
Population16811,767

Myrrhee vs Somerville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $920K in Myrrhee and $915K in Somerville, so Somerville is the cheaper entry point, with Myrrhee houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Myrrhee sits at a median of $170K against $630K in Somerville, which makes Myrrhee the more affordable unit market and Somerville the pricier one.

On cash flow, Somerville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.91% in Myrrhee, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Somerville and 3.0% in Myrrhee, so landlords in Somerville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Somerville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,767 against 168, roughly 70 times the size of Myrrhee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Somerville for rental income, Somerville for a lower purchase price, Somerville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison