Skip to main content

Nailsworth vs Vale Park

Property investment comparison - Nailsworth, SA 5083 vs Vale Park, SA 5081

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nailsworth wins 2, Vale Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNailsworthVale Park
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$650K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.44%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%4.16%
1-year house growth+9.2%estimate+9.8%
3-year house growth-+35.8%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population2,2352,452

Nailsworth vs Vale Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Nailsworth and $1.4M in Vale Park, so Nailsworth is the cheaper entry point, with Vale Park houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Vale Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.84%, compared with 2.44% in Nailsworth, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Nailsworth (an estimate) and +9.8% in Vale Park, so recent momentum favours Vale Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Vale Park and 1.9% in Nailsworth, so landlords in Vale Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Vale Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,452 against 2,235, larger than Nailsworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Vale Park for rental income, Nailsworth for a lower purchase price, Vale Park for recent price momentum, Vale Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison