Nana Glen vs Wyong
Property investment comparison - Nana Glen, NSW 2450 vs Wyong, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nana Glen wins 2, Wyong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Nana Glen | Wyong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $565K | $565K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.67% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.41% | 4.90% |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9%estimate | +8.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +8.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,132 | 4,530 |
Nana Glen vs Wyong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $900K in Nana Glen and $905K in Wyong, so Nana Glen is the cheaper entry point, with Wyong houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Nana Glen (an estimate) and +8.1% in Wyong, so recent momentum favours Nana Glen, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Wyong and 1.6% in Nana Glen, so landlords in Wyong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wyong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,530 against 1,132, roughly 4.0 times the size of Nana Glen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Nana Glen for a lower purchase price, Nana Glen for recent price momentum, Wyong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison