Naringal vs Newcomb
Property investment comparison - Naringal, VIC 3277 vs Newcomb, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Naringal wins 2, Newcomb wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Naringal | Newcomb |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $645K |
| Median unit price | $725K | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.35% | 3.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.16% | 4.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +11.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 124 | 4,704 |
Naringal vs Newcomb: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Naringal and $645K in Newcomb.
For units, Naringal sits at a median of $725K against $510K in Newcomb, which makes Newcomb the more affordable unit market and Naringal the pricier one.
On cash flow, Naringal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.35%, compared with 3.95% in Newcomb, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Newcomb is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,704 against 124, roughly 38 times the size of Naringal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Naringal for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison