Skip to main content

Narrabri vs Parkes

Property investment comparison - Narrabri, NSW 2390 vs Parkes, NSW 2870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narrabri wins 3, Parkes wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNarrabriParkes
Median house price$480K$480K
Median unit price$360K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.60%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%-
1-year house growth+4.3%+7.0%
3-year house growth+14.4%-2.8%
Vacancy rate1.0%2.7%
Population7,32711,324

Narrabri vs Parkes: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $480K in Narrabri and $480K in Parkes.

On cash flow, Narrabri leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.60%, compared with 4.80% in Parkes, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Narrabri and +7.0% in Parkes, so recent momentum favours Parkes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Narrabri houses are +14.4% and Parkes houses -2.8%, so Narrabri has compounded faster than Parkes over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Narrabri and 2.7% in Parkes, so landlords in Narrabri face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,324 against 7,327, larger than Narrabri; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Narrabri for rental income, Parkes for recent price momentum, Narrabri for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison