Skip to main content

Narraweena vs Surry Hills

Property investment comparison - Narraweena, NSW 2099 vs Surry Hills, NSW 2010

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narraweena wins 1, Surry Hills wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNarraweenaSurry Hills
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price-$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.54%2.75%
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%4.80%
1-year house growth+3.2%estimate+4.2%
3-year house growth-+5.7%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.5%
Population6,97115,828

Narraweena vs Surry Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Narraweena and $2.5M in Surry Hills, so Surry Hills is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Surry Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.75%, compared with 2.54% in Narraweena, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.2% in Narraweena (an estimate) and +4.2% in Surry Hills, so recent momentum favours Surry Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Narraweena and 1.5% in Surry Hills, so landlords in Narraweena face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Surry Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,828 against 6,971, roughly 2.3 times the size of Narraweena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Surry Hills for rental income, Surry Hills for a lower purchase price, Surry Hills for recent price momentum, Narraweena for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison