Narraweena vs Wedderburn
Property investment comparison - Narraweena, NSW 2099 vs Wedderburn, NSW 2560
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narraweena wins 2, Wedderburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Narraweena | Wedderburn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.54% | 1.56% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.86% | 4.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.2%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 7.7% |
| Population | 6,971 | 665 |
Narraweena vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Narraweena and $2.5M in Wedderburn, so Wedderburn is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Narraweena leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.54%, compared with 1.56% in Wedderburn, a gap of 0.98 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Narraweena and 7.7% in Wedderburn, so landlords in Narraweena face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narraweena is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,971 against 665, roughly 10 times the size of Wedderburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narraweena for rental income, Wedderburn for a lower purchase price, Narraweena for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison