Skip to main content

Natural Bridge vs Seventeen Mile Rocks

Property investment comparison - Natural Bridge, QLD 4211 vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD 4073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Natural Bridge wins 2, Seventeen Mile Rocks wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNatural BridgeSeventeen Mile Rocks
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$275K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.05%3.16%
Gross rental yield (units)3.77%4.34%
1-year house growth-+9.0%
3-year house growth-+58.3%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.8%
Population902,699

Natural Bridge vs Seventeen Mile Rocks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Natural Bridge and $1.3M in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so Natural Bridge is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Seventeen Mile Rocks leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.16%, compared with 3.05% in Natural Bridge, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.

Seventeen Mile Rocks is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,699 against 90, roughly 30 times the size of Natural Bridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seventeen Mile Rocks for rental income, Natural Bridge for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison