Netherby vs North Mackay
Property investment comparison - Netherby, QLD 4650 vs North Mackay, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Netherby wins 1, North Mackay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Netherby | North Mackay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $640K | $645K |
| Median unit price | - | $420K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.48% | 5.52% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +75.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 12.4% | 1.3% |
| Population | 25 | 6,194 |
Netherby vs North Mackay: what the numbers say
The median house price is $640K in Netherby and $645K in North Mackay, so Netherby is the cheaper entry point, with North Mackay houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, North Mackay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.52%, compared with 4.48% in Netherby, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in North Mackay and 12.4% in Netherby, so landlords in North Mackay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Mackay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,194 against 25, roughly 248 times the size of Netherby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Mackay for rental income, Netherby for a lower purchase price, North Mackay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison