New Gisborne vs Werneth
Property investment comparison - New Gisborne, VIC 3438 vs Werneth, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: New Gisborne wins 2, Werneth wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | New Gisborne | Werneth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $885K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.84% | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +3.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| Population | 2,509 | 66 |
New Gisborne vs Werneth: what the numbers say
The median house price is $880K in New Gisborne and $885K in Werneth, so New Gisborne is the cheaper entry point, with Werneth houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, New Gisborne leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.84%, compared with 2.54% in Werneth, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Werneth and 3.3% in New Gisborne, so landlords in Werneth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
New Gisborne is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,509 against 66, roughly 38 times the size of Werneth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: New Gisborne for rental income, New Gisborne for a lower purchase price, Werneth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison