Skip to main content

Newport vs Runaway Bay

Property investment comparison - Newport, QLD 4020 vs Runaway Bay, QLD 4216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newport wins 2, Runaway Bay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNewportRunaway Bay
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.4M$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.75%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.05%-
1-year house growth+12.8%+16.3%
3-year house growth+34.2%+18.2%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.9%
Population5,9649,308

Newport vs Runaway Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Newport and $1.6M in Runaway Bay, so Newport is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Newport sits at a median of $1.4M against $1.0M in Runaway Bay, which makes Runaway Bay the more affordable unit market and Newport the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in Newport and +16.3% in Runaway Bay, so recent momentum favours Runaway Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Newport houses are +34.2% and Runaway Bay houses +18.2%, so Newport has compounded faster than Runaway Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Runaway Bay and 2.0% in Newport, so landlords in Runaway Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Runaway Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,308 against 5,964, larger than Newport; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newport for a lower purchase price, Runaway Bay for recent price momentum, Runaway Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison