Skip to main content

Newtown vs One Mile

Property investment comparison - Newtown, QLD 4350 vs One Mile, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newtown wins 3, One Mile wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNewtownOne Mile
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$590K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.97%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)4.18%4.13%
1-year house growth+18.4%+17.8%
3-year house growth+60.0%+67.3%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.3%
Population10,0392,038

Newtown vs One Mile: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Newtown and $730K in One Mile.

On cash flow, Newtown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.97%, compared with 3.71% in One Mile, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.4% in Newtown and +17.8% in One Mile, so recent momentum favours Newtown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Newtown houses are +60.0% and One Mile houses +67.3%, so One Mile has compounded faster than Newtown over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in One Mile and 0.9% in Newtown, so landlords in One Mile face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 2,038, roughly 4.9 times the size of One Mile; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newtown for rental income, Newtown for recent price momentum, One Mile for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison