Newtown vs Thinoomba
Property investment comparison - Newtown, QLD 4350 vs Thinoomba, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newtown wins 1, Thinoomba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Newtown | Thinoomba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | $590K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.97% | 4.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.18% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +60.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 12.5% |
| Population | 10,039 | 16 |
Newtown vs Thinoomba: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Newtown and $730K in Thinoomba.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.97% in Newtown and 4.01% in Thinoomba, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Newtown and 12.5% in Thinoomba, so landlords in Newtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 16, roughly 627 times the size of Thinoomba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Newtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison