Skip to main content

Newtown vs Wilsonton Heights

Property investment comparison - Newtown, QLD 4350 vs Wilsonton Heights, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newtown wins 2, Wilsonton Heights wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNewtownWilsonton Heights
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$590K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.97%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.18%3.75%
1-year house growth+18.4%+21.7%
3-year house growth+60.0%+73.1%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.9%
Population10,0392,747

Newtown vs Wilsonton Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Newtown and $730K in Wilsonton Heights.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.97% in Newtown and 4.00% in Wilsonton Heights, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.4% in Newtown and +21.7% in Wilsonton Heights, so recent momentum favours Wilsonton Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Newtown houses are +60.0% and Wilsonton Heights houses +73.1%, so Wilsonton Heights has compounded faster than Newtown over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 2,747, roughly 3.7 times the size of Wilsonton Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wilsonton Heights for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison