Skip to main content

Newtown vs Queenscliff

Property investment comparison - Newtown, VIC 3220 vs Queenscliff, VIC 3225

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newtown wins 4, Queenscliff wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNewtownQueenscliff
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$580K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%3.77%
1-year house growth+3.8%-9.7%estimate
3-year house growth-9.9%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.7%
Population10,4451,516

Newtown vs Queenscliff: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Newtown and $1.1M in Queenscliff.

For units, Newtown sits at a median of $580K against $740K in Queenscliff, which makes Newtown the more affordable unit market and Queenscliff the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Newtown and -9.7% in Queenscliff (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Newtown, while Queenscliff went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Newtown and 1.7% in Queenscliff, so landlords in Newtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,445 against 1,516, roughly 7 times the size of Queenscliff; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newtown for recent price momentum, Newtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Newtown vs Queenscliff: Suburb Comparison 2026