Skip to main content

Nimbin vs Rutherford

Property investment comparison - Nimbin, NSW 2480 vs Rutherford, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nimbin wins 2, Rutherford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNimbinRutherford
Median house price$785K$785K
Median unit price$360K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)6.52%-
1-year house growth+10.1%estimate+12.3%
3-year house growth-+22.8%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.4%
Population1,60713,091

Nimbin vs Rutherford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $785K in Nimbin and $785K in Rutherford.

For units, Nimbin sits at a median of $360K against $580K in Rutherford, which makes Nimbin the more affordable unit market and Rutherford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rutherford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.87% in Nimbin, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.1% in Nimbin (an estimate) and +12.3% in Rutherford, so recent momentum favours Rutherford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Nimbin and 1.4% in Rutherford, so landlords in Nimbin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rutherford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,091 against 1,607, roughly 8 times the size of Nimbin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rutherford for rental income, Rutherford for recent price momentum, Nimbin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Nimbin vs Rutherford: Property Investment Comparison (2026)