Nirimba vs Yamanto
Property investment comparison - Nirimba, QLD 4551 vs Yamanto, QLD 4305
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nirimba wins 0, Yamanto wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Nirimba | Yamanto |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $920K | $920K |
| Median unit price | - | $940K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.44% |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9% | +16.1% |
| 3-year house growth | +31.8% | +57.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.6% |
| Population | 2,229 | 4,971 |
Nirimba vs Yamanto: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Nirimba and $920K in Yamanto.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Nirimba and +16.1% in Yamanto, so recent momentum favours Yamanto, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Nirimba houses are +31.8% and Yamanto houses +57.9%, so Yamanto has compounded faster than Nirimba over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Yamanto and 1.1% in Nirimba, so landlords in Yamanto face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yamanto is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,971 against 2,229, roughly 2.2 times the size of Nirimba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yamanto for recent price momentum, Yamanto for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison