Skip to main content

Noarlunga Downs vs Strathalbyn

Property investment comparison - Noarlunga Downs, SA 5168 vs Strathalbyn, SA 5255

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Noarlunga Downs wins 2, Strathalbyn wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNoarlunga DownsStrathalbyn
Median house price$815K$810K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)4.21%4.08%
1-year house growth+12.2%+13.5%
3-year house growth+38.5%+41.8%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.4%
Population4,0317,246

Noarlunga Downs vs Strathalbyn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $815K in Noarlunga Downs and $810K in Strathalbyn, so Strathalbyn is the cheaper entry point, with Noarlunga Downs houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Noarlunga Downs and +13.5% in Strathalbyn, so recent momentum favours Strathalbyn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Noarlunga Downs houses are +38.5% and Strathalbyn houses +41.8%, so Strathalbyn has compounded faster than Noarlunga Downs over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Noarlunga Downs and 0.4% in Strathalbyn, so landlords in Noarlunga Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Strathalbyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,246 against 4,031, larger than Noarlunga Downs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Strathalbyn for a lower purchase price, Strathalbyn for recent price momentum, Noarlunga Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison