Skip to main content

Nollamara vs Waikiki

Property investment comparison - Nollamara, WA 6061 vs Waikiki, WA 6169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nollamara wins 3, Waikiki wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNollamaraWaikiki
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$755K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.62%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+23.5%estimate+20.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%2.1%
Population12,77912,453

Nollamara vs Waikiki: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Nollamara and $840K in Waikiki.

For units, Nollamara sits at a median of $755K against $620K in Waikiki, which makes Waikiki the more affordable unit market and Nollamara the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nollamara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.62%, compared with 4.10% in Waikiki, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.5% in Nollamara (an estimate) and +20.1% in Waikiki (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nollamara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Nollamara and 2.1% in Waikiki, so landlords in Nollamara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nollamara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,779 against 12,453, larger than Waikiki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nollamara for rental income, Nollamara for recent price momentum, Nollamara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison