Noorinbee vs Yarram
Property investment comparison - Noorinbee, VIC 3890 vs Yarram, VIC 3971
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Noorinbee wins 1, Yarram wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Noorinbee | Yarram |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $390K | $415K |
| Median unit price | $165K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.14% | 4.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.03% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.1% |
| Population | 84 | 2,136 |
Noorinbee vs Yarram: what the numbers say
The median house price is $390K in Noorinbee and $415K in Yarram, so Noorinbee is the cheaper entry point, with Yarram houses about 6% dearer.
On cash flow, Yarram leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 3.14% in Noorinbee, a gap of 1.31 percentage points.
Yarram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,136 against 84, roughly 25 times the size of Noorinbee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yarram for rental income, Noorinbee for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison