Skip to main content

Noosaville vs Wilston

Property investment comparison - Noosaville, QLD 4566 vs Wilston, QLD 4051

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Noosaville wins 3, Wilston wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNoosavilleWilston
Median house price$2M$2.0M
Median unit price$1M$865K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.19%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%3.62%
1-year house growth+5.5%+9.3%
3-year house growth+27.0%+8.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.9%
Population8,7164,110

Noosaville vs Wilston: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2M in Noosaville and $2.0M in Wilston, so Noosaville is the cheaper entry point, with Wilston houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Noosaville sits at a median of $1M against $865K in Wilston, which makes Wilston the more affordable unit market and Noosaville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.5% in Noosaville and +9.3% in Wilston, so recent momentum favours Wilston, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Noosaville houses are +27.0% and Wilston houses +8.7%, so Noosaville has compounded faster than Wilston over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Wilston and 1.5% in Noosaville, so landlords in Wilston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Noosaville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,716 against 4,110, roughly 2.1 times the size of Wilston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Noosaville for a lower purchase price, Wilston for recent price momentum, Wilston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison