Noranda vs Wilson
Property investment comparison - Noranda, WA 6062 vs Wilson, WA 6107
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Noranda wins 1, Wilson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Noranda | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $675K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.80% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.93% | 6.08% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | +70.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Population | 8,002 | 6,608 |
Noranda vs Wilson: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Noranda and $1.2M in Wilson, so Wilson is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Noranda and 0.9% in Wilson, so landlords in Noranda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Noranda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,002 against 6,608, larger than Wilson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wilson for a lower purchase price, Noranda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison