Skip to main content

North Albury vs Segenhoe

Property investment comparison - North Albury, NSW 2640 vs Segenhoe, NSW 2337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Albury wins 0, Segenhoe wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth AlburySegenhoe
Median house price$590K$590K
Median unit price$340K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.27%5.87%
Gross rental yield (units)6.12%6.87%
1-year house growth+16.5%-
3-year house growth+38.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population6,232219

North Albury vs Segenhoe: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $590K in North Albury and $590K in Segenhoe.

For units, North Albury sits at a median of $340K against $325K in Segenhoe, which makes Segenhoe the more affordable unit market and North Albury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Segenhoe leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.87%, compared with 4.27% in North Albury, a gap of 1.60 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Segenhoe and 1.6% in North Albury, so landlords in Segenhoe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Albury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,232 against 219, roughly 28 times the size of Segenhoe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Segenhoe for rental income, Segenhoe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison