Skip to main content

North Booval vs Shaw

Property investment comparison - North Booval, QLD 4304 vs Shaw, QLD 4818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Booval wins 1, Shaw wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth BoovalShaw
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$660K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.04%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%5.00%
1-year house growth+19.9%estimate+15.8%
3-year house growth-+70.3%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.7%
Population3,041760

North Booval vs Shaw: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in North Booval and $745K in Shaw.

For units, North Booval sits at a median of $660K against $525K in Shaw, which makes Shaw the more affordable unit market and North Booval the pricier one.

On cash flow, Shaw leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 4.04% in North Booval, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.9% in North Booval (an estimate) and +15.8% in Shaw, so recent momentum favours North Booval, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Shaw and 1.2% in North Booval, so landlords in Shaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Booval is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,041 against 760, roughly 4.0 times the size of Shaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Shaw for rental income, North Booval for recent price momentum, Shaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison