Skip to main content

North Hobart vs Taroona

Property investment comparison - North Hobart, TAS 7000 vs Taroona, TAS 7053

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Hobart wins 4, Taroona wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth HobartTaroona
Median house price$940K$950K
Median unit price-$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.45%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.18%1.93%
1-year house growth-1.3%+1.8%
3-year house growth+15.5%-4.0%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.3%
Population2,6003,121

North Hobart vs Taroona: what the numbers say

The median house price is $940K in North Hobart and $950K in Taroona, so North Hobart is the cheaper entry point, with Taroona houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.3% in North Hobart and +1.8% in Taroona, so recent momentum favours Taroona, while North Hobart went backwards.

Looking back three years, North Hobart houses are +15.5% and Taroona houses -4.0%, so North Hobart has compounded faster than Taroona over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in North Hobart and 2.3% in Taroona, so landlords in North Hobart face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taroona is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,121 against 2,600, larger than North Hobart; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Hobart for a lower purchase price, Taroona for recent price momentum, North Hobart for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison