Skip to main content

North Macksville vs Wentworth Point

Property investment comparison - North Macksville, NSW 2447 vs Wentworth Point, NSW 2127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Macksville wins 0, Wentworth Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth MacksvilleWentworth Point
Median house price$820K$815K
Median unit price-$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.79%5.39%
Gross rental yield (units)5.18%-
1-year house growth+7.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.8%
Population66912,703

North Macksville vs Wentworth Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $820K in North Macksville and $815K in Wentworth Point, so Wentworth Point is the cheaper entry point, with North Macksville houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Wentworth Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.39%, compared with 3.79% in North Macksville, a gap of 1.60 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Wentworth Point and 2.6% in North Macksville, so landlords in Wentworth Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wentworth Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,703 against 669, roughly 19 times the size of North Macksville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wentworth Point for rental income, Wentworth Point for a lower purchase price, Wentworth Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison