North Manly vs Theresa Park
Property investment comparison - North Manly, NSW 2100 vs Theresa Park, NSW 2570
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Manly wins 1, Theresa Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | North Manly | Theresa Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.4M | $3.4M |
| Median unit price | $1.1M | $720K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.47% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.07% | 4.02% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Population | 3,396 | 600 |
North Manly vs Theresa Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $3.4M in North Manly and $3.4M in Theresa Park.
For units, North Manly sits at a median of $1.1M against $720K in Theresa Park, which makes Theresa Park the more affordable unit market and North Manly the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.7% in North Manly and 3.8% in Theresa Park, so landlords in North Manly face less competition for tenants.
North Manly is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,396 against 600, roughly 6 times the size of Theresa Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Manly for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison