Skip to main content

North Warrandyte vs Oakleigh

Property investment comparison - North Warrandyte, VIC 3113 vs Oakleigh, VIC 3166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Warrandyte wins 1, Oakleigh wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth WarrandyteOakleigh
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$955K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.03%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.04%5.65%
1-year house growth+2.6%-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth+22.6%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.4%
Population3,0278,442

North Warrandyte vs Oakleigh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in North Warrandyte and $1.4M in Oakleigh, so Oakleigh is the cheaper entry point.

For units, North Warrandyte sits at a median of $955K against $585K in Oakleigh, which makes Oakleigh the more affordable unit market and North Warrandyte the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in North Warrandyte and -0.9% in Oakleigh (an estimate), so recent momentum favours North Warrandyte, while Oakleigh went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Oakleigh and 1.5% in North Warrandyte, so landlords in Oakleigh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oakleigh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,442 against 3,027, roughly 2.8 times the size of North Warrandyte; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oakleigh for a lower purchase price, North Warrandyte for recent price momentum, Oakleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison