Skip to main content

Norwood vs Trevallyn

Property investment comparison - Norwood, TAS 7250 vs Trevallyn, TAS 7250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Norwood wins 4, Trevallyn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorwoodTrevallyn
Median house price$695K$700K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.54%4.23%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.65%
1-year house growth+16.3%estimate+13.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%2.5%
Population3,8694,826

Norwood vs Trevallyn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $695K in Norwood and $700K in Trevallyn, so Norwood is the cheaper entry point, with Trevallyn houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Norwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.54%, compared with 4.23% in Trevallyn, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.3% in Norwood (an estimate) and +13.1% in Trevallyn (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Norwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Norwood and 2.5% in Trevallyn, so landlords in Norwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Trevallyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,826 against 3,869, larger than Norwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Norwood for rental income, Norwood for a lower purchase price, Norwood for recent price momentum, Norwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison