Skip to main content

Notting Hill vs Whitelaw

Property investment comparison - Notting Hill, VIC 3168 vs Whitelaw, VIC 3950

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Notting Hill wins 3, Whitelaw wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNotting HillWhitelaw
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$435K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.82%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)7.50%4.27%
1-year house growth+0.7%-
3-year house growth+8.5%-
Vacancy rate1.9%0.5%
Population2,89530

Notting Hill vs Whitelaw: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Notting Hill and $1.2M in Whitelaw.

For units, Notting Hill sits at a median of $435K against $460K in Whitelaw, which makes Notting Hill the more affordable unit market and Whitelaw the pricier one.

On cash flow, Notting Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.82%, compared with 2.45% in Whitelaw, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Whitelaw and 1.9% in Notting Hill, so landlords in Whitelaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Notting Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,895 against 30, roughly 97 times the size of Whitelaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Notting Hill for rental income, Whitelaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison