Skip to main content

Nowra Hill vs Wallacia

Property investment comparison - Nowra Hill, NSW 2540 vs Wallacia, NSW 2745

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nowra Hill wins 3, Wallacia wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNowra HillWallacia
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$620K$285K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.50%2.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%4.71%
1-year house growth+7.1%+4.3%estimate
3-year house growth+5.7%-
Vacancy rate2.0%2.3%
Population2,1411,711

Nowra Hill vs Wallacia: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Nowra Hill and $1.3M in Wallacia.

For units, Nowra Hill sits at a median of $620K against $285K in Wallacia, which makes Wallacia the more affordable unit market and Nowra Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wallacia leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.80%, compared with 2.50% in Nowra Hill, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Nowra Hill and +4.3% in Wallacia (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nowra Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Nowra Hill and 2.3% in Wallacia, so landlords in Nowra Hill face less competition for tenants.

Nowra Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,141 against 1,711, larger than Wallacia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wallacia for rental income, Nowra Hill for recent price momentum, Nowra Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison