Oakleigh South vs Taminick
Property investment comparison - Oakleigh South, VIC 3167 vs Taminick, VIC 3675
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Oakleigh South wins 2, Taminick wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Oakleigh South | Taminick |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.97% | 2.03% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.00% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +10.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | - |
| Population | 9,851 | 139 |
Oakleigh South vs Taminick: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Oakleigh South and $1.3M in Taminick, so Oakleigh South is the cheaper entry point, with Taminick houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Oakleigh South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 2.03% in Taminick, a gap of 0.94 percentage points.
Oakleigh South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,851 against 139, roughly 71 times the size of Taminick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Oakleigh South for rental income, Oakleigh South for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Oakleigh South, VIC 3167
Open Oakleigh South suburb profileRecent sales in Oakleigh South
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison