Skip to main content

Oatlands vs Waitara

Property investment comparison - Oatlands, NSW 2117 vs Waitara, NSW 2077

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Oatlands wins 1, Waitara wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOatlandsWaitara
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$1.2M$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.02%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.76%
1-year house growth+3.4%estimate-5.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population5,8337,837

Oatlands vs Waitara: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Oatlands and $2.5M in Waitara.

For units, Oatlands sits at a median of $1.2M against $800K in Waitara, which makes Waitara the more affordable unit market and Oatlands the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Oatlands (an estimate) and -5.5% in Waitara (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Oatlands, while Waitara went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Waitara and 1.6% in Oatlands, so landlords in Waitara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waitara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,837 against 5,833, larger than Oatlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oatlands for recent price momentum, Waitara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison