Skip to main content

Ombersley vs Ormond

Property investment comparison - Ombersley, VIC 3241 vs Ormond, VIC 3204

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ombersley wins 3, Ormond wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOmbersleyOrmond
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$365K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.60%2.59%
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%4.06%
1-year house growth--5.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.9%
Population938,328

Ombersley vs Ormond: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Ombersley and $1.8M in Ormond.

For units, Ombersley sits at a median of $365K against $720K in Ormond, which makes Ombersley the more affordable unit market and Ormond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ormond leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 1.60% in Ombersley, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ombersley and 1.9% in Ormond, so landlords in Ombersley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ormond is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,328 against 93, roughly 90 times the size of Ombersley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormond for rental income, Ombersley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison