One Mile vs Thinoomba
Property investment comparison - One Mile, QLD 4305 vs Thinoomba, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: One Mile wins 1, Thinoomba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | One Mile | Thinoomba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.71% | 4.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.13% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +67.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 12.5% |
| Population | 2,038 | 16 |
One Mile vs Thinoomba: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in One Mile and $730K in Thinoomba.
On cash flow, Thinoomba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.01%, compared with 3.71% in One Mile, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in One Mile and 12.5% in Thinoomba, so landlords in One Mile face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
One Mile is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,038 against 16, roughly 127 times the size of Thinoomba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Thinoomba for rental income, One Mile for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison