Oran Park vs Wilton
Property investment comparison - Oran Park, NSW 2570 vs Wilton, NSW 2571
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Oran Park wins 1, Wilton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Oran Park | Wilton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $820K | $675K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 1.96% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9% | +17.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +11.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 4.5% |
| Population | 17,624 | 3,767 |
Oran Park vs Wilton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Oran Park and $1.2M in Wilton.
For units, Oran Park sits at a median of $820K against $675K in Wilton, which makes Wilton the more affordable unit market and Oran Park the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Oran Park and +17.8% in Wilton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wilton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Oran Park and 4.5% in Wilton, so landlords in Oran Park face less competition for tenants.
Oran Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,624 against 3,767, roughly 4.7 times the size of Wilton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wilton for recent price momentum, Oran Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison