Skip to main content

Orange Grove vs Salter Point

Property investment comparison - Orange Grove, WA 6109 vs Salter Point, WA 6152

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Orange Grove wins 1, Salter Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOrange GroveSalter Point
Median house price$2.4M$2.2M
Median unit price$360K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.82%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)6.17%4.89%
1-year house growth-+15.8%
3-year house growth-+43.3%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population7262,913

Orange Grove vs Salter Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Orange Grove and $2.2M in Salter Point, so Salter Point is the cheaper entry point, with Orange Grove houses about 8% dearer.

On cash flow, Salter Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.50%, compared with 1.82% in Orange Grove, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Salter Point and 1.4% in Orange Grove, so landlords in Salter Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salter Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,913 against 726, roughly 4.0 times the size of Orange Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Salter Point for rental income, Salter Point for a lower purchase price, Salter Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison