Skip to main content

Orange Grove vs Subiaco

Property investment comparison - Orange Grove, WA 6109 vs Subiaco, WA 6008

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Orange Grove wins 1, Subiaco wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOrange GroveSubiaco
Median house price$2.4M$2.2M
Median unit price$360K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.82%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)6.17%-
1-year house growth-+21.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%0.8%
Population7269,940

Orange Grove vs Subiaco: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Orange Grove and $2.2M in Subiaco, so Subiaco is the cheaper entry point, with Orange Grove houses about 8% dearer.

For units, Orange Grove sits at a median of $360K against $815K in Subiaco, which makes Orange Grove the more affordable unit market and Subiaco the pricier one.

On cash flow, Subiaco leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 1.82% in Orange Grove, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Subiaco and 1.4% in Orange Grove, so landlords in Subiaco face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Subiaco is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,940 against 726, roughly 14 times the size of Orange Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Subiaco for rental income, Subiaco for a lower purchase price, Subiaco for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison