Skip to main content

Orange vs Tarro

Property investment comparison - Orange, NSW 2800 vs Tarro, NSW 2322

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Orange wins 1, Tarro wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOrangeTarro
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$505K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.98%5.05%
1-year house growth+9.9%+11.1%
3-year house growth+0.6%+25.5%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.8%
Population41,2321,703

Orange vs Tarro: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Orange and $750K in Tarro.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.19% in Orange and 4.20% in Tarro, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Orange and +11.1% in Tarro, so recent momentum favours Tarro, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Orange houses are +0.6% and Tarro houses +25.5%, so Tarro has compounded faster than Orange over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Orange and 2.8% in Tarro, so landlords in Orange face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Orange is the bigger suburb, with a population of 41,232 against 1,703, roughly 24 times the size of Tarro; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tarro for recent price momentum, Orange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison